The Middle East. We were special at one point. Today I would like to take a minute to look at where we are, where we were, and how we’ve fallen so far. For decades, we’ve lived and survived off of stories of the “ancestors.” They did this, they did that. Pioneers in medicine and science. Inventors of soap and the compass. Best food on the planet – that part is still true. You ever have Syrian shawarma? Or Egyptian koshari? Or Palestinian hummos? Yeah, we can still cook. But aside from that, we are the most backwards place on Earth. War-plagued and divided, we were once the center of immigration, education and innovation, the ones who created the foundations for the modern world, we are now behind everyone else on Earth.
Let’s start with the wars.
Syria. Palestine. Iraq. Libya. Yemen.
Palestine first.
The Palestinians are victims of European supremecy. Denied a right to their homeland, forced out and villianized, the Palestinians are not given equal rights, denied access to water, education. They are overly policed and treated in the most inhuman of ways. Their situation is not their fault. And to explain why, we must address the most common argument of those who try to ignore it.
The most common argument against the Palestinians being given a state is that Palestine never existed. There is much to write about regarding the Palestinians and the Israelis and that entire conflict, but since this post will focus on FIVE wars, I will only address the BIGGEST ARGUMENTS. Perhaps in another post I will give my full thoughts on this issue, and why I believe that a one state, non denominational state is the only solution. For now, I’ll address the talking point I hear the most.
Palestine did exist. If you stop thinking in Western ways for a minute. The state of a western style state with borders and a ruling mansion did not exist. But not only in Palestine, that style of organizing your civilization did not exist in the Americas with the Native Americans, or with the African tribes of what is today Ghana, the Ivory Coast. The Europeans have this way of thinking, that if something is not exactly like ours then it’s wrong. It’s ours for the taking. The name Palestine exists in the history books of those who wrote to give it away, but you don’t need to look towards the British and French to justify the existance of Palestine. It was not a Western style state, but it was a nation. With people living there. Who called it home. But those people were not white, like the Native Americans before them. The Black South Africans. The American slaves. The Indians. The ancestors of the modern day Ghanians. And so the Europeans, as was their ways, did not even treat them as humans, ignoring the people of that land to do with it what they pleased.
Well, that may be true you say, but this is the case all over. The Americans killed the Natives, Australians killed the Aboriginals. Gotta get over it.
The problem is, the attacks on Palestine’s existance continues today. Israeli settlements continue to steal land from the Palestinians in the West Bank, where a system of Apartheid is in place. Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the freedom fighter from South Africa called the Apartheid system in Palestine worse than what he endured under White only rule in South Africa. A UN report that came out in 2017 used the word Apartheid to describe the Israelis occupation of Palestinian terretories, saying that they faced “discrimination in access to healthcare, education, housing, emplyment, building rights and residency.” Palestinians children are arrested and tossed in jail. There are roads that they are not allowed to walk on. They can be forced from their homes and forced to give them up to illegal settlers. These are all documented offenses. So When I say that the Palestinians are not at fault for their dilema, I mean it. All they want is to live free on their land. They are the indeginous people. They don’t invite the settlers to come in and take away their land, their kids and their rights. And we haven’t even talked about the horrors of what Israel does in Gaza. But like I said. Another post, for another day.
Libya.
Libya was a civil war disguised as a revolution. Gaddafi was horrible man, but he was not the universally hated devil that the west painted him to be. What you have to understand about Libya is this; Libya is not a unifed state. Historically it is 3 states, with two main ones that we will discuss. Tripoli and El Barqa. Let’s call Tripoli the West, and El Barqa the East, for the sake of keeping things simple. After the fall of colonialism in Libya, this new country with western drawn borders, brought together three very different regions, that historically were never a real nation. In Libya, the tribe comes before the country. But Libya needed a ruler, and King Idris became it’s first head of state. A king from the East. Idris was overthrown in bloodless coup by Gaddafi, a man from Sirte, a town in the West. Gaddafi would, during his four decades in power, pour a lot of money into the west. Most famously, he turned Sirte from a fishing village into a thriving metropolis. So to be blunt, he was not the hated man you were told he was. He was very popular in Africa, and he maintains a very high level of popularity amongst many Libyans, particularly in the areas he helped develp.
I’ll give you an example. After Sirte fell, the city wouldn’t get behind the new regime. I remember reading an article from that time about how schools would not play the new national anthem.
Now, that was all important background information, because now we have to talk about the rebels. Can you find anyone who can tell you what these people stood for?
It’s so easy to WANT them to be democratic. Republicans. People who are the future of North Africa. But the rebel army came together for one reason and one reason alone. To de throne Gaddafi. These were people of many backgrounds. Those who believed in democracy, and those who believed in ISIS. Those who wanted conservative Islamism in the form of Turkey, and those who wanted a secular dictatorship in the form of Egypt. The rebels were never a unified force, led by former members of the Gaddafi regime, the west rushed in to “help” the rebels out of pure hatred of Gaddafi. In their rush to “help” we created a massive issue. Gaddafi was killed, and now, you had a bunch of small militias, all with massivly different views on how to govern Libya.
There were of course, those who believed in Democracy, and Libya had a democratic election. There were those who belived in a strongman, a military leader like Egypt’s El-Sisi, those followed Khalifa Haftar, a Libyan general who declared war on Islamism. And there are those who wanted the ISIS model of Syria to come to Libya. Can these ideologies co exist?
They didn’t think so either. And so we are currently in the middle of the second Libyan civil war. A country overrun by guns, with no infrastructure in place thanks to Gaddafis fears of a coup.
Yemen.
Saudi Arabia’s fault. This country, this war, it’s on Salman. It’s on his son. This is their mess.
In Feburary of 2011, millions of Yemenis took to the streets to demand the ouster of their tyranical dictator, Ali Abdulla Saleh. Revolution insued, the president stepped down, the vice president became president, and then war broke out.
OK OK OK. Back up a bit. A minute, an hour.
Yemen is historically two countries. North and South. The country is the poorest in the Middle East, and it is overrun by terrorists of the Al Qaeda and Iran kind. Al Qaeda is usually working with the government to keep people scared, while the Iranian backed terror group known as the Houthis, has considerable support amongst the nation’s sizable Shia population. So. South and North don’t like each other. Al Qaeda usually allied with ex president Saleh. Houthis, supported and funded by Iran.
OK. War broke out. The Houthis overthrew the government. With Iran’s backing they took over most of Yemen, and the president had to flee to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia now, hates everything Iran. So, naturally, they attacked. And they attacked brutally. Yemenis today are dying from easily curable diseases. They don’t have access to clean water. Saudi Arabia has devastated the poorest country in the region. They are responsible for the humanitarian catastophe in Yemen, worse than anything I’ve seen in a long time. And the Yemeni people are not to blame for their prediciment. Their fate has neve rbeen in their own hands. The former president Saleh would release Al Qaeda on them to keep them in line. Iran controls the Houthis who keep them in line. Saudi Arabia bombs them and controls their current…errr…president…to keep them in line. They have no wealth. The poverty level is insane. All while surrounded by the wealthiest countries on Earth. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar. And you may ask, why would I mention them. It’s not their fault Yemen is so poor. But I mention them because I know Arab culture. I know what these Arab leaders brag about to propogate their regimes. “Arabs are one. We stand together, help each other.” Qatar and the UAE put billions into buying Manchester City and Paris Saint Germain to entertain Europeans, while their NEIGHBOR. Running out of water and food and medicine. They bomb. There is a word in the Arabic language called “Orooba.” “Arabness” or “the essence of the Arabs.” This word is used to say that we must all help each other, support each other. Its a word that carries significant weight in the Arabic language. And not one Arab leader can be described with that word. They all lack Orooba.
Iraq.
Sorry. This one’s on us. Bush was a bad president. We killed a million Iraqis, handed Baghdad to the Iranians and kind of created the right environment for one ISIS to grow. Our bad. I’m sure the US will never try that ever again! We have…oh crap we’re doing it again in
Syria.
So I want to talk about Syria and Iraq together, because the two countries are EXTREMLY SIMMILAR.
So Assad and Saddam Hussien are both Ba’thist minority rulers. Let me explain what I just said.
The Ba’ath party is an Arab nationalistic Socialist party. Secular, the party believes in some very good things, such as women’s rights. Syria for example, under Assad, was definetly the best place in the Middle East to be a woman, to be a Christian, or Shia, or Armenian. Assad had an excellent track record of protecting minorities and women.
The Ba’ath party also believes in absolute rule, and crushing anyone who steps in their way, so there’s that.
Because of the Ba’ath party’s historical allegience to the now defunct Soviet Union, they don’t like America. At all. America = bad. Russia = good. So that’s that. Assad is from a minority sect of Islam known as the Alawites. He is an Arab. Syria is ethnically diverse. The dominant group are the Sunni Arabs, followed by the Sunni Kurds, the Sunni Turkmen, Christian Arabs, Alaweite Arabs, Druze, Christian Armenians, ext. That order is probobly not correct. The one two that are correct are the first 2. Arabs and Kurds are the largest 2 groups.
Saddam Hussien was a Sunni Arab, in a country where the dominant group was Shia Arabs, followed by Sunni Arabs, followed by Sunni Kurds, followed by Christian Arabs. So both came from minorities in their own country. Similar enough.
Syria started out as a protest movement, and here is where you can copy and paste what I wrote about Libya. But unlike Libya, the infrastructure of Syria was strong. And even with western backing for a very vague rebellion, the Syrian army never fell.
Now while the Syrian army never fell, they were also weakened. So while the west rushed to overthrow Assad for reasons while supporting awful tyrants all over the world like El Sisi, Assad’s allies rushed to his defense. Syria had a strong relationship with Russia, allowing the Russians to pretty much run the show. China, Iran, Lebanon all stood by Assad, and with their support he has taken back much of the land from the rebels. They are now irrelevant almost. They will not win this war. But another force popped up in Syria. Maybe you’ve heard of them. ISIS? Bad people. Now, Syria’s war has now become an international festival for the war happy. Saudi Arabia want’s Assad gone out of love for democracy…..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. He likes Iran so he has to go.
Turkey wants Assad gone because they made a point to support all the Arab Spring uprisings when they began, and they’re like the Trump supporter who STILL supports him now, just having to come up with excuse after excuse for being there.
The west is in Syria to colonize. They don’t own that government like they do Egypt and others, and the west only allows dictators when they follow their orders.
Russia is in to colonize. They own Syria, they don’t want the west to have it.
China is in it for business. Lebanon is in it to support Iran.
And that ladies and gentlemen is where we are at. The world fighting in Syria, forcing the Syrians to leave, while also rejecting them from coming in. Nothing is more insane than bombing the Syrians, forcing them to leave, then when they come to you for help you turn them away.
And that, my readers, is my Middle East. That’s how we got here.